It's Tuesday afternoon, let's get right to the point, the pawning of privacy is masked upon the illusion of security in your home land as a mechanism of confusion for and into the conception of game theory, and what is perplexed from its experience. It seems, everyone is pawning a concept of house security these days, even companies that claim to be environmentally safe, such as the Idaho owned Melaleuca Inc., when it is more about "control" of and for a theory of duplication that happens to be exhibited by Melaleuca Inc. on the surface of distributive activity.The deeper aspect of "being safe" may have nothing to do with "exclusive", rather that of autonomy, which is recreated with a bit of oil. What connects us may actually not be what is seen or made into the concrete highways across the gaps. It may also be that it is possible to close the gaps in a way not perceived yet than through simple theory.
Immediately the perception of both "private" and "public" come into view for examination in the mind. The exploration of the true meanings of these two particular words surely needs navigation, and open discussion as the concept of having the right to that navigation is removed by technological data collection. This may be given in many examples such as the ability to choose what you eat that is marginalized into what you have a choice of.
If by example we use the primary navigation of physics and sound, we may begin to see a relationship between the two words in question where one is averted to the point of origin of the body, and one is seemingly visible. I currently and neglectfully shop at Publix, a store that carries the homonym, but the selection has dwindled to a tightly selected few items that are trusted. They happen to carry a few organic items, even a selection of food from India that is natural rice and curry, but for the majority, most if not all are lacking of source data, such as the genetically modified data leaving the customer to guess as to the data, a redaction or Mr. Smith that has been shown to be hazardous to your health.
Finding public food that is not private is difficult in the Florida oligopoly of management as commerce. Public food must be local and natural as it is obviously intended to be. What is private should also in this sense be protected, and that of the mind and its ability to navigate privately and having the equal opportunity of hearing as others' monopolize.
The battle line in our minds may have begun with the tilt applied in computer physics, as if you remember, games began with the simple tennis match between two knobs each capable of two moves, and the star-gate was opened. As we attempt to create ourselves, we may also be eating ourselves, and as someone who has studied English etymology for a few years, this is also evident in our language construction, but this would be expected as a form of record.
Long ago, our world was not over populated with privatized units, and over time the changes were not made because it seems they were either ignored, or completely unnoticed as the result. Our language etymology reveals that it contains a refined methodology of consumption specifically signifying Earth as food. This is an expected result without the consideration of growth and the creation of words that would provide the necessary balance. In simple terms, we have learned specifically how to consume Earth entirely.
The abortion of Earth is clearly explained in full view for both private and public perception.
1. ed-. to eat (stuff?); original meaning “to bite”
2. eg-. I?
3. eghs-. out
4. ēghws-. to drink; drunk
5. ei-. to go; mode of knowledge?
6. ēik-. to be master of, possess?
7. eis-. words denoting passion
8. ekwo-. horse
9. el-. elbow, forearm, (anarthrous?)
10. em-. to take? (help!), distribute
11. en-. in? (You were just out above.)
12. epi-. near, at, against
13. er-1. to move, set in motion, (navigation?)
14. er-2. earth, yum, yum
15. erə-. to row, (game or theory?)
16. ers-. to be in motion; wander
17. es-. to be (what?)
18. (e)su-. good
19. eu-1. to dress
20. eu-2. void, (whoops, what happened?)
21. euə-dh-r. udder or schwartz?
The mystic of creation lives within us and is "repeated", or "duplicated", and as you can see, each has its own direction. There is no design, in this sense, there is only navigation. If this is perceived as commerce, the definitive intercourse, this is surely not the creation, but a simple design that would seem to exemplify a game of Democracy that is perceived as love. A wild experiment where the land is the food that is the menace unto itself that has become drunk without a horse.In brief form, if Democracy Duck is to repair itself, the salvation of the power of the sun must be made for the demon light now being privatized when its creation is killing us. To get this right, we pay those who manage them, not the labor, extenuated for public good when this role could be reversed as a point of reference. In this scenario, the institution has a (together) effect as that of the hive of bees. The central focus or that of the mother becomes the Gaia that is often sought and lost all of the same stigma, and that of love.
With some oil, the bird of paradise may be set free, but if (s)he is left to run on the ground as oil, we may never find a match to light the fire. and the theory slowly moves into the horizon as the next event.
To close this gap, the basic instinct of theory may be to realize that we are all some form of spy. It is that we often think we are a spy and are not. This spy is troublesome always ruining things. Then, there is the bullish spy who now loves itself. The real spy that seems overt is the journalist. And this spy moves around a lot. And, there you have it. Ping pong? Monologue?
[R. Mark Sink is editor of www.euthenist.org and is author of "The Haunted House of Etymology" published in November 2009.]

